MetaPocalypse: Calling for a New Buddhism

Where is our will to power??? The pulse of a world ruled in defiance to the overbearing human spirit. The ultimate Nietzschean question.

Those with the most money: Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, and Elon Musk

Are they worth the estimates in excess of 100 billion dollars, or do they just retain arbitrary power like the ancient kaisers and kaiserins of germany?
Arbitrarily appointed godly leaders? What is this? Inferior scientific minds, embedded in the hyperspace of the post-kaiser post-modernity.

Where is the godly appointment of actual saints among men? That is, of real leadership an upgrade of the status quo of humanity: freedom from evolution co-occuring with the freedom to evolve. A will to the within…

Where is our trans-evolutionary movement?
We must be the movers and shakers, of a new movement, however arbitararily fragmented of a systemic galactic library… A universal metalanguage of all knowledge and data. We can weave these pieces back together.

Where is our will to power??? The pulse of a world ruled in defiance to the overbearing human spirit. The ultimate Nietzschean question.

Integral Church launches first Virtual Circle

Integral Church


Welcome to Integral Church. 

  1. We are an interfaith circle composed of people of different beliefs, traditions and paths. We are atheist, Buddhist, Catholic, Sufi, Baha’i, Jew, Muslim, Taoist, new age mystics and universalists. We are all born into or have entered through the front door of a belief system — a view of the world, a cosmology — and we exit through the back door into the lush, shared garden courtyard of interfaith dialogue and deep religious pluralism.
  2. Our circle is interspiritual. We have different practices, prayers, songs, sacred texts and ways of making meaning. We enjoy trying these practices on to see how they feel and if they “work.” We are willing participants in the experiment of understanding Spirit (as a force or presence) and spirituality (as an attitude and line of development).
  3. Our circle is integral. We include everyone’s values, politics, ways of being and doing…

View original post 298 more words

Embracing Four Quadrant Materialism: for all ages

Let’s say we are going to use the four quadrants as a heuristics. The four methods of knowing man/woman.
We start in the lower right and upper right, the finite cause and the exceptional cause, respectively. From there, we proceed to the lower left, the synthetic cause (mental), arriving finally at the infinite cause (spiritual).
This shows us the basic limits of logic (methodological causes), synthetic, or proactive logic (ontological causes), and translogic (transfinite, indeterminate nonduality).

Unconscious Regimes (Epistemes) of Spirit Qualia

That’s Spirit too
(Spirit) The spirit and intution of the infinite……..
I awaken you in the morning….
(Spirit) Vague echos of Courage, Prudence, Charity, and Faith support the meaning.

That’s Mind too
I am a collective! I am the collective evolution, no longer an unconscious mind at the service of science, bathwater religion.

That’s Body too.
I am unconsciousness as sleeping material. My heart reaks of spirit, but my head respresents a foundationalist naturalism, in perpetua. Discourse regimes en route to more anti-consumer quantology.

Goodness, Beauty and Truth

Goodness is the substantive logos, which is not only quantized, but felt. It is the umwelt, the world’s being in itself. Substantive in measure, but generative in scope. High in process, but deep in metaphorical ontology.
Beauty is depth-in-itself. Passion-in-itself. Being for being. Knowing for knowing. Intuitive science sans intuitive science.
Truth is the measure of being, the world as flux. Total mobility of meaning, with limitless flows of material process, pre-karmic and anti-cultural, anty beautific habitus.

Integral Skillful means towards Oneness with God

Quadrant Paths

Level Paths

Line Paths

State Paths

Type Paths

Self-system Paths (?)

Shadow Paths

misc. Paths

Comprehending Communicative Networks: Netocratic Principia

Dear friends and readers of this blog, if there is such a thing as a netocracy, a world formed by networks, and their hyperreal simulation as simultaneous events of both mental signifiers and physical signifieds, then that integral netocracy must have some kind of internal logic.
Now what we have done is differentiated on a path to integrating a list of the three principles of social cognition which have validity to this network era, and science more broadly.

If you will, a type of non-abstract Principia Metamoderna discrete mathematics effort, but it is simultaneously so much more than that, if you can understand the underlying spiritual logic.

The following list is suggestive in good faith and spiritual knowledge not only for a broad science, but for a new trans-relativist Principia of the meta-moderna phase space we are now in as a transformative culture.

Netocratic Principia
1) enact spiritual (transphysically {translogically} enactivate) networks
2) prehend mental (visually (dia-logic) transcend) networks
3) nonexclude physical (communicatively (monologically) differentiate) networks.

Inter-textual Creativity: Understanding Foucault, Heidegger, Nietzsche, later Wittgenstein

The general tenor {compositional density} of a general inter-faith postmodernism
Perry Anderson, Jean Baudrillard, Zygmunt Bauman, Steven Best, Judith Butler, Gilles Deleuze, Jacques Derrida, Mike Featherstone, Michel Foucault, Francis Fukuyama, Felix Guattari, Donna J. Haraway, Sandra Harding, Nancy Harsock, David Harvey, Linda Hutcheon, Andreas Huyssen, Luce Irigaray, Frederic Jameson, Keith Jenkins, Douglass Kellner, Ernesto Laclau, Jean Francois Lyotard, Michel Maffesoli, Doreen Massey, Chantel Mouffe, Linda J. Nicholson, Friedrich Nietzsche, Richard Rorty, Steven Seidman, Hugh J. Gianni Vattimo, Robert Venturi, Wolfgang Welsch, Ludwig Wittgenstein (later Wittgenstein), Iris Marion Young, Slavoj Zizek.¹

Postmodernism through paradigm

highly influential [postmodernists] (established ‘classics’, ‘paradigm inventors’, and ‘game changers’) (e.g. Foucault, Heidegger, Nietzsche, later Wittgenstein;

very influential (very prominent contemporary scholars) (e.g. Anderson, Baudrillard, Bauman, Butler, Deleuze, Derrida, Fukuyama, Guattari, Jameson, Laclau, Latour, Lyotard, Meffesoli, Mouffe, Rorty, Zizek);

influential (prominent contemporary scholars) (e.g. Best, Featherstone, Haraway, Harding, Harstock, Harvey, Hassan, Heller, Hutcheon, Huyssen, Irigaray, Jenkins, Kellner, Lash, Lyon, Massey, Nicholson, Seidman, Silverman, Soja, Tester, Urry, Vattimo, Venturi, Welsch, Young).²

citation¹ – ² Introduction to The Postmodern Turn In The Social Sciences: Who are the postmodernists?

The Standard Biden 1 2

Sanders has just suffered an upset to his front-runner status. Right now it seems that Biden will be the nominee (3/4/2020).
It also seems that the corporate state has collectively coronated him.

So what is the status of the would be political revolution of the left (not violent revolution)? This remains to be known.

Terry Patten, an Integral luminary, has suggested that Biden will lead a seemingly insurgent round-about Tea Party Left movement.

While, on another front, the political commentator ThouArtThat0, a youtube Whiteheadian neurosophist, has indicated that the fight is still on, that Bernie can upend this re-insurrection fought so hard by an entitled corporate liberal establishment.

Independently, Eric Weinstein, within hours of victory, has compared this election to a grave and surreal pathological blackhole, gnawing for our attention, and yet with every interaction bringing closer to a decreased feeling of wholeness and yet a potentially deepening apathetic withdrawal.