We can only survive if we enjoin each other as a whole. And postmodernism has failed to offer a valid set of anti-capitalist regimes. Therefore, we need a remodernism, or a new set of enlightenment techniques. If we are to survive as a species. In the long term. If we cannot transcend postmodern critique, or even get to that stage then our planet and the enlightenment project will be doomed. Transcend and include. Remodernism, Metamodernism, Performatism All ideas that oscillate between the “ideal human” and his enslavement to post-capitalist society We must even critique the critique. You know. In the long term we are looking fucked in terms of planetary survival. The only way to match our immense technology, is an equal development of wisdom. The co-development between art, self, and technology. As well as tech and self Cultural motif, culture genetics, culture theory Because if we can include the past, instead of always focusing on ourselves then we can heal our pathology We can heal capitalism We can defeat capitalism By intersecting the art discipline with the socio-scientific. That requires intellectual growth. As well as shadow work, to heal the traumas of our cultural identity. Because post-modernism teaches us that reality is a simulacrum, which means we are creating this pluriform cultural identity. But at the same time that requires moral strength, and a anti-nihilist life-passion (as nietzsche would say), which subsumes the further fracturing.
Those who detract from the esoteric core of the world’s religions, do so in the name of immanence (the platonic idea of being in the world of meaning).
The heart of the esoteric teachings are concerned with transcendence, the neoplatonic idea of unity, oneness.
It seems that between these two views, there comes the view of the Yogachara school of Tibetan Buddhism, which states that One and Many-ness are expressed in the mind of the participant, which is a beginingless continuum of clear light.
In Modern, and Postmodern times, we tend to focus on very abstract concepts, in isolation. This is the road of abstraction, which creates an isolating core of propositional metaphysics defined by anti-holism, unique in its core. Via particularization – as opposed to meaning – and also exclusion and imperialism, the domination of Truth (and abstract logos and dia logos) over the very real logic of harmonious non-partisan interaction that seems to have shaped the core beauty, and goodness of the Enlightenment (1700) tradition seems to have taken place.
Lama Zopa Rinpoche is diplomatic group-centric mythic buddhist.
Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche is a Skill-centric early orange buddhist.
Steven Batchelor is a self-determining Achiever Self. Late orange buddhist.
Professor Alan Wallace is a physicist, while also transcending materialist metaphysics. He is green altitude.
Reasoning on the Nature of The One Infinite Creator: Erotic Emergence and Nondual Being
Transformative (idealist), Emergent (naturalist), and Aperspective (dialecticist)
Idealism is a primary intuition, and as such, its transformative potential informs, upregulates and downregulates and empowers formative actuality. Materialism is also a fact, which upregulates and, sub-articulates the meaning of LL and UL, with its transformative dialectic of emergentism. Technically Materialism is a tertiary intuition, so it is three points removed away from the circle. The third dialectic is called aperspectivism (LL), which creates the basis for energy as such to enter into any formative agreement within its own nature.
Each of these laws or distortions of the One Infinite Creator, or Godhead, suffers upon the perspectival weight of its own emergentism. The point within the triangle of becoming is the dialectical resolution point of the three faces of spirit (transformative, emergent, and aperspective), through which non-dual emergentism (as it were) takes place within the evolutive Erotic transcendelia of each Being in Time.
We need a participatory commons of body/mind/spirit healing (ie wholing). The main agenda should not be the constant churning of meta-theoretical cognition which has seem to become the basis of most people’s theorizing (see Bawen and Post-Wilberians Theoretics). The participatory commons I’m speaking of is not a superficial supercomputer, network, “teal cognition”, or gnosis — in fact it’s the complete opposite. The participatory commons should not instruct cognitive participation, but it should reward cognitive embodiment, based and verified through the grammar of healing. A true Post-Integral participatory commons beyond simply mere meta-secularization, meta-modernism, or any such rarefied process. It will be the participation in a “Republic of the Heart” to take a quote from Terry Patton. Building the commons requires group participatory spiritual action, heretic-ally whole individuals, developmental ontologists, and those willing to do the spiritual work of ascension, and full yogic now-embodiment, in service of the Divine Life – the post-secularizing truth.